Campaign sparks fierce debate over game preservation and dev freedom
The digital games industry is witnessing a growing ideological feud between two influential voices: Ross Scott, creator of the Stop Killing Games (SKG) campaign, and Thor, the outspoken developer behind Pirate Software. What started as a unified call for consumer protection has now evolved into a full-blown debate about digital ownership, game preservation, and developer autonomy.
Ross Scott’s crusade to save vanishing games
Launched by YouTuber Ross Scott in response to Ubisoft’s 2023 takedown of The Crew, the SKG campaign argues that consumers are being sold games with hidden expiration dates. Titles requiring online servers—even for single-player content—vanish when those servers shut down, robbing players of their purchases.
Scott calls this digital planned obsolescence and is now pushing for legal action via a European Citizens’ Initiative. His goal is to compel game publishers to ensure games remain playable after online services end, either through offline modes or open-source alternatives. The initiative has gained traction among gamers frustrated with digital rights erosion.
Pirate Software’s rebuttal: Unrealistic and harmful
Not everyone in the dev world agrees. Thor of Pirate Software argues that SKG’s proposals are impractical, particularly for indie studios. In his June 2025 video rebuttal, he accused the campaign of overreach and misinformation, especially around expectations that devs convert online-only games to offline ports.
Scott responded with a video of his own, doubling down and calling Thor’s statements misleading. The exchange escalated further when Pirate Software released a follow-up video on June 26, reiterating concerns that SKG could inadvertently harm small developers by imposing unrealistic preservation obligations.
Philosophical divide: Art, product, or both?
This isn’t just a tech issue—it’s a cultural one. Should video games be preserved like literature and cinema, or are they ephemeral experiences tied to specific eras and infrastructures? SKG sees games as digital heritage. Pirate Software views them as interactive products that developers must retain full control over, including when and how they disappear.
The legal implications are mounting. As lawmakers weigh potential regulations on digital ownership and game preservation, this debate could shape the future of digital rights and creative responsibility in gaming.